Latest current affairs · 29 Sep
Enrol · ₹3,500
Latest current affairs29 Sep
Free live webinar · NABARD Grade A 2026: what the 2025 cut-offs changed, and the 90-day plan · Sun, 4 Oct at 7:30 PM ISTJoin free
Skip to content

CCI’s 2025 Cost Norms

1 min read
RBI Grade BNABARD ESISEBI
In one line

Context:

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has notified the Determination of Cost of Production Regulations, 2025, marking a major reform in how predatory pricing is assessed and regulated in India. These reforms aim to reinforce competition safeguards, especially in digital and capital-intensive markets, by introducing clear, consistent benchmarks based on Average Total Cost (ATC).

What is Predatory Pricing?

Definition:

Predatory pricing involves a dominant firm deliberately setting prices below cost to eliminate competitors, eventually gaining monopoly power.

Example:most asked

“RBI MPC Unpacked: Key Theory Meets Today’s Macro Trends”Tap to play · from the C4S channel

More on this exam

NSE vs. MCX case—NSE deployed zero-pricing strategies in currency derivatives, leading to allegations of market exclusion and regulatory scrutiny.

Key Features of Predatory Pricing

  • Prices below production costs
  • Intent to eliminate competitors
  • Short-term consumer benefits followed by long-term monopoly harms
  • Reduced market choice and innovation
Free PDF · print or read offline Download this page as a PDF

A clean PDF of this page with the C4S header — it opens right away, and the link comes to your WhatsApp too.

The link opens at once. After that, only study material and course updates. No spam.

Types:

  1. Direct Predation – Prices deliberately kept below cost.
  2. Cross-subsidisation – Using profits from one business segment to undercut rivals in another.
  3. Discriminatory Pricing – Targeting specific segments with lower prices to squeeze out competition.

Factors Encouraging Predatory Pricing

  • Dominant Market Power with deep reserves
  • Network Externalities in digital markets (e.g., data lock-ins)
  • Weak Enforcement Record (only one predatory pricing case upheld pre-2025)
  • Lack of Metric Clarity (older rules didn’t define “cost” benchmarks)
  • Jurisdiction Gaps in cross-border e-commerce
  • Short-Term Myopia in consumer response

Challenges in Regulation

  • Proof of Intent: Predatory motive is difficult to establish under Section 4 of the Competition Act.
  • Chilling Effect: Startups in AI, FinTech often avoid competitive segments due to fear of capital-intensive predation.
  • Fragmented Market Surveillance: Absence of dynamic monitoring tools delays early detection.
  • Judicial Delays: Legal battles often outlast the market cycle they intend to correct.

Related on Clarity 4 Sure

WhatsApp