Latest current affairs · 14 Oct
Enrol · ₹3,500
Latest current affairs14 Oct
Free live webinar · NABARD Sprint 60: the 2025 cut-offs and your 60-day Phase I plan · Sun, 18 Oct at 7:30 PM ISTJoin free
Skip to content

Obesity in India

2 min read
All exams GA
In one line

Context:

An analysis of the earnings data for salaried workers, casual labourers, and self-employed persons from Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS) reports shows that when adjusted for inflation, wages for salaried workers in India have stagnated since 2019.

Tackling Obesity in India

Background

  • Dramatic obesity and diabetes crisis, wherein
    • 1 in 4 adults are obese.
    • 1 in 4 adults are diabetic or pre diabetic (National Family Health Survey 5).
  • The Economic Survey 2025 put forth a suggestion for levying a health tax on ultra processed foods (UPFs) in opposition to their high consumption.
  • However, weak food marketing regulations counter any credible action taken in this regard.

Food Labelling and Advertisement Dilemmas

Flawed Labelling System

  • FSSAI’s Indian Nutrition Rating (INR) (2022)
    • Modeled loosely on Australia’s ineffective health star system.
  • Deceptive star ratings
    • Making UPF look good.
  • Conflict of interest
    • Policymaking was heavily influenced by the food industry.
    • Traffic light warning labels (2021 draft regulations) were scrapped due to pressures from the industry.
Free PDF · print or read offline Download this page as a PDF

A clean PDF of this page with the C4S header — it opens right away, and the link comes to your WhatsApp too.

The link opens at once. After that, only study material and course updates. No spam.

Problems of INR System

  • These UPFs continue to be rated ‘healthy’
    • 2 Stars for Biscuits (high fat, sugar, salt).
    • 2 Stars for Soft Drinks (high sugar).
    • 3 Stars for Cornflakes (high sugar, sodium).
  • International Best Practice
    • Warning labels (Chilean way ‘high in’ black labels), have reduced consumption by UPFs by 24%.
  • The Way Ahead: Shift INR into mandatory ‘high in’ warning label implementation according to WHO or Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines.

Weak Advertising Regulations

  • Four existing laws try to halt the misleading advertising HFSS/UPF, but none are effective.
  • 2017 National Multisectoral Action Plan called for restricting HFSS food ads, however, no action has been taken.
  • Consumer Protection Act, 2019
    • Defines ‘misleading ads’ but does not compel nutritional information to be declared in food ads.
  • For instance: A cola drink is free to advertise sugar per bottle, which is 9 10 teaspoons.
  • Gaps in FSSAI Regulations
    • No clear definition of HFSS/UPFs.
    • There are no nutritional disclosure requirements in ads.
  • Impact
    • Marketing for unhealthy foods is directed at children & youth that aggravate the rates of obesity & diabetes.
  • Global evidence: Banning junk food ads is shown to effectively reduce childhood obesity rates.

Recommendations: The Way Forward

  • Inevitably disband Indian Nutrition Rating systems, compulsorily introduce mandatory ‘high in’ warning labels under WHO and ICMR guidelines.
  • Specify threshold limits for sugar/salt/fat applicable to HFSS food products in conformity with the WHO SEARO and ICMR NIN guidelines.
  • Close advertising loopholes by
    • Either amending the existing laws or making a new consolidated HFSS/UPF ad ban.
    • Restrict junk food ads, especially targeting children.
    • Launch a national campaign against UPFs and their risks through multiple languages.

Source: The Hindu

Related on Clarity 4 Sure

WhatsApp