Latest current affairs · 27–28 Sep
Enrol · ₹3,500
Latest current affairs27–28 Sep
Free live webinar · NABARD Grade A 2026: what the 2025 cut-offs changed, and the 90-day plan · Sun, 4 Oct at 7:30 PM ISTJoin free
Skip to content

SBI’s Report on Poverty

2 min read
RBI Grade BNABARD ESISEBI
In one line

Context:

The release of the 2023-24 Household Consumer Expenditure Survey (HCES) fact sheet has reignited the poverty debate in India. While recent estimates suggest a sharp decline in poverty levels, the methodological challenges and historical context continue to complicate the discourse.

Key Developments in the Poverty Estimates

  • 2023-24 Poverty Estimates:
    • Rural Poverty: Declined from 7.2% (2022-23) to 4.9%.
    • Urban Poverty: Declined from 4.6% (2022-23) to 4.1%.
    • National-level poverty dropped significantly from 21.5% in 2011-12 to below 5% in 2023-24 (SBI report).
  • Historical Trends:
    • The poverty line traditionally reflected the minimum expenditure required to meet basic calorie needs.
    • Evolving methodologies (Tendulkar and Rangarajan Committees) and shifts in survey techniques have introduced inconsistencies over time.

Evolution of Poverty Measurement in India

Free live session

NABARD Grade A 2026: what the 2025 cut-offs changed, and the 90-day plan

In 5 days · Sun, 4 Oct at 7:30 PM IST

Register free →
“RBI MPC Unpacked: Key Theory Meets Today’s Macro Trends”Tap to play · from the C4S channel

More on this exam

Free PDF · print or read offline Download this page as a PDF

A clean PDF of this page with the C4S header — it opens right away, and the link comes to your WhatsApp too.

or get the download link here
The link opens at once. After that, only study material and course updates. No spam.

Early Methodology

  • Anchored to a calorie-based poverty line proposed by Dandekar and Rath (1960s).
  • Adopted by the Planning Commission with periodic revisions using price inflators.

Shift from Calorie Norms (Tendulkar Committee)

  • Recommended moving away from calorie-based thresholds to a broader consumption basket.
  • Used urban poverty benchmarks for rural areas and introduced the Mixed Reference Period (MRP).

Rangarajan Committee's Redefined Basket

  • Defined the poverty line with specific calorie, fat, and protein requirements.
  • Added normative expenses for non-food essentials (clothing, housing, mobility, and education).
  • The report was not officially adopted but highlighted higher poverty estimates compared to Tendulkar’s method.

Recent Methodological Innovations

  • Modified Mixed Reference Period (MMRP):
    • Records consumption across three timeframes: weekly (food), monthly (regular goods), and yearly (large expenditures).
  • Inclusion of Imputed Values:
    • Expenditures now account for free provisions like laptops, bicycles, school uniforms, and food.
  • Improved Data Collection:
    • Adoption of three-monthly household visits for better accuracy.

Challenges in Comparing Poverty Estimates

  • Data Inconsistencies:
    • New methodologies (2022-23 and 2023-24 surveys) are not strictly comparable with the 2011-12 data, leading to underestimated poverty figures.
  • Urban-Rural Gap:
    • Decline in rural-urban poverty disparity attributed to unchanged urban boundaries since 2011. Inclusion of potential “census towns” could increase rural poverty estimates.
  • Impact of Methodological Changes:
    • Enhanced expenditure recording through imputed values and multiple visits inflates consumption figures, complicating longitudinal comparisons.

Human Development Report(HDR) 2023-24

Related on Clarity 4 Sure

WhatsApp