All exams GA
In one line
Source: TH
Context:
A major tribal organisation in Manipur, Thadou Inpi Manipur, has urged the Central Government and the Ministry of Tribal Affairs to remove the “Any Kuki Tribes (AKT)” category from the state’s Scheduled Tribes (ST) list. The demand has gained support from other groups, including the Meitei Alliance and representatives of the Hmar community.
What Is “Any Kuki Tribes (AKT)”?
- A collective/umbrella category added under the ST list in 2003.
- Instead of naming individual tribes, it broadly lists “Any Kuki Tribes”.
- Covers multiple sub-groups using the larger “Kuki” identity.
Why Is There Opposition to AKT?
1. Lack of Clarity
- The term “Any Kuki Tribes” is considered vague and open-ended.
- Critics argue that it allows indefinite additions without clear tribal identity markers.
2. Risk of Misuse
- Allegation that AKT enables:
- identity fraud,
- manipulation of ST certificates,
- inflow of individuals with no historical roots claiming ST benefits.
3. Overlap With Existing Tribes
- Tribes such as Thadou, Hmar, Vaiphei, Gangte, etc. are already listed individually.
- AKT allegedly duplicates some groups, reducing distinct recognition.
4. Not Meeting Constitutional Criteria
- Under Article 342, ST status requires:
- distinct culture/linguistic identity,
- geographical isolation,
- social and economic backwardness.
- Opponents say “Kuki” is a political umbrella, not a single tribe.
5. Ethnic & Security Concerns
- Claims that loose classification may:
- facilitate illegal immigration from Myanmar,
- expand land/benefit claims,
- fuel demographic tensions.
