Latest current affairs · 24 Oct
Enrol · ₹3,500
Latest current affairs24 Oct
Free live webinar · NABARD Grade A 2026: 45-Day Final Revision Plan + Daily Targets · Today at 7:30 PM ISTJoin free
Skip to content

IMF Assigns Second-Lowest ‘C’ Rating to India’s National Accounts Statistics (NAS) and Inflation Data

3 min read Source: BS
All exams GA
In one line

Context

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) currently rates India’s national accounts data at ‘C’, the second-lowest grade in its four-tier Data Adequacy Assessment (DAA) scale. The IMF assesses the adequacy of official statistics for surveillance of a country’s economy. A ‘C’ rating indicates that data shortcomings somewhat hamper economic surveillance.

Following India’s announcement of a new GDP and CPI series, the IMF is expected to upgrade its rating in early 2026.

Key Highlights:

National Accounts Statistics (NAS): Received a ‘C’ grade.

  • Implication: Data is available regularly, but methodological weaknesses hinder cross-country comparability and effective economic surveillance.

Consumer Price Index (CPI): Graded ‘B’, meaning it is broadly adequate but with some shortcomings.

Current Status and IMF Assessment
  • India’s DAA rating of ‘C’ has persisted for two consecutive years (2024–25).
  • Concerns cited by IMF staff include:
    • Outdated base year (2011-12) for GDP
    • Single deflation methods introducing cyclical biases
    • Gaps between production and expenditure approaches
    • Limited coverage of the informal sector
  • IMF notes India’s data is broadly adequate, but further improvements would enhance surveillance and policy formulation.

Reasons for ‘C’ Grade – IMF Observations

  1. Outdated Base Year:
    • GDP and CPI still rely on 2011–12 consumption and production structures, not reflecting the modern economy.
  2. Use of WPI as Deflators:
    • Absence of a comprehensive Producer Price Index (PPI) forces reliance on wholesale prices, weakening real GDP estimates.
  3. Production vs Expenditure Gaps:
    • Recurring discrepancies indicate undercoverage of expenditure data and significant informal sector activity.
  4. Limited Seasonal Adjustment:
    • Quarterly GDP lacks robust seasonal adjustments, affecting growth trend analysis.
  5. Need for Better Statistical Techniques:
    • IMF recommends improved modelling practices for national accounts.

India’s National Accounts Statistics (NAS)

Publisher: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI)

Purpose:
  • Provides a comprehensive macroeconomic database of India’s economy, including GDP, GVA, consumption, investment, savings, and related aggregates.
Methodology:
  • System Followed: UN System of National Accounts (SNA-2008)
  • Income Approach (Primary): GDP estimated using incomes of households, enterprises, and government.
  • Expenditure Approach (Supplementary): GDP estimated via consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports.
  • Sectoral GVA Method: Value added computed across agriculture, industry, services at current and constant (2011–12) prices.
Key Indicators Published:
  • GDP & GVA: Sector-wise and aggregate
  • Consumption Expenditure: Private and government
  • Gross Capital Formation (GCF): Machinery, construction, valuables
  • Savings & Investment Rates across sectors
  • National Income, Disposable Income, Per-Capita Indicators
Upcoming Revisions in India’s Data
  • GDP base year: Updated to 2022-23, first revision since 2015.
  • CPI base year: Updated to 2024 to better reflect consumption patterns.
  • Methodological improvements:
    • Better volume estimates using double deflation techniques with producer price indices
    • Inclusion of new data sources and improved statistical methods for quarterly GDP
  • Expected launch: February 2026
Other Improvements Highlighted by Indian Officials
  • Balance of Payments (BoP):
    • Released with a 2-month lag from Q1 FY26
    • RBI plans monthly BoP statistics (lag ~40 days, more aggregate level)
  • National accounts compilation: Uses data from private corporate and government accounts, improving coverage and granularity
  • Suggested regular benchmark revisions for national accounts, prices, and other data sets in line with international best practices
IMF Recommendations for Further Improvements
  • Conduct population census to ensure survey representativeness (last in 2011–12)
  • Provide timely consolidated government fiscal accounts
  • Expand data coverage for NBFCs
  • Improve timeliness and granularity of systemic financial linkages

Free PDF · print or read offline Download this page as a PDF

A clean PDF of this page with the C4S header — it opens right away, and the link comes to your WhatsApp too.

The link opens at once. After that, only study material and course updates. No spam.

Related on Clarity 4 Sure

WhatsApp