Latest current affairs · 14 Oct
Enrol · ₹3,500
Latest current affairs14 Oct
Free live webinar · NABARD Sprint 60: the 2025 cut-offs and your 60-day Phase I plan · Sun, 18 Oct at 7:30 PM ISTJoin free
Skip to content

NITI Aayog’s US Trade Proposal: A Risk to India’s Food Security?

2 min read
All exams GA
In one line

Context:

A recent NITI Aayog paper recommends significant tariff cuts on key US agricultural imports—rice, dairy, poultry, corn, apples, almonds, and genetically modified (GM) soya—under the proposed India-US Free Trade Agreement (FTA). However, experts warn these moves could critically undermine India’s food security, farmer incomes, and trade sovereignty.

Key Recommendations and Criticisms

  • Rice Tariff Elimination: A Dangerous Precedent
    • NITI suggests scrapping tariffs on US rice, citing India’s rice export surplus.
    • Critique: Historical lessons from the PL-480 era (1960s–70s) and GATT rounds show that prematurely locking low tariffs can lead to long-term vulnerabilities.
  • Vulnerability to Global Price Volatility
    • The paper ignores risks of global grain price crashes (like in 2014–2016) and price spikes (2005–2008, 2010–11).
    • Without tariffs, cheap US subsidised grains could flood Indian markets, discouraging local production.
  • Undermining India’s WTO Position
    • Removing rice tariffs may reward US trade lobbies that consistently challenge India’s MSP and procurement policies at the WTO.
    • For example, the USA Rice Federation has accused India of distorting global markets through its subsidy system.

Genetically Modified Imports

GM Corn and Soy: Containment Unrealistic

  • Recommends importing:
    • GM corn byproducts (DDGS) for animal feed (re-export model).
    • GM soybean seeds for coastal crushing under a “controlled” model.
  • Critique: India’s fragmented supply chains and poor enforcement make GM contamination likely, risking:
    • Domestic food chain pollution.
    • Export bans from countries rejecting GMOs.

Why This Matters

Strategic Autonomy and Rural Stability

In 3 days · NABARD Sprint 60: the 2025 cut-offs and your 60-day Phase I plan · Register free →

  • The paper underestimates:
    • India’s reliance on tariff flexibility to manage food price shocks.
    • The fragility of rural incomes and the scale of agrarian employment (700+ million people).
  • Tariff flexibility is not outdated protectionism—it is a vital tool to:
    • Stabilize domestic markets,
    • Insulate small farmers from subsidized imports,
    • And safeguard food security.
Free PDF · print or read offline Download this page as a PDF

A clean PDF of this page with the C4S header — it opens right away, and the link comes to your WhatsApp too.

The link opens at once. After that, only study material and course updates. No spam.

Need for Democratic Consultation

  • Any decision to liberalise the farm sector under FTA must involve:
    • State governments
    • Farmer organizations
    • Independent experts

BS

Related on Clarity 4 Sure

WhatsApp